{"id":89187,"date":"2021-01-12T16:11:27","date_gmt":"2021-01-12T21:11:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thedailygouge.com\/?p=89187"},"modified":"2021-01-12T16:11:34","modified_gmt":"2021-01-12T21:11:34","slug":"the-daily-gouge-archive-monday-january-11th-2021","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thedailygouge.com\/?p=89187","title":{"rendered":"The Daily Gouge Archive, Monday, January 11th, 2021"},"content":{"rendered":"

It’s Monday, January 11th, 2021…but before we begin, words have meaning, a fact seemingly lost on so many in the MSM today, including, unfortunately, the staff at National Review Online<\/em><\/strong>, as while a recent headline accompanying a story from Brittany Bernstein read…<\/strong><\/p>\n

FBI: \u2018No Indication\u2019 That Antifa Was Involved in Storming of U.S. Capitol<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/h1>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

…the story told another tale entirely:<\/strong><\/p>\n

“The Federal Bureau of Investigation said Friday that there was \u201cno indication\u201d that members of\u00a0Antifa<\/a><\/em><\/span>\u00a0had gone undercover as pro-Trump supporters to spark chaos during Wednesday\u2019s storming of the U.S. Capitol by defenders of the president.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

In response to a question about whether such an effort had taken place, as some Republican lawmakers had suggested, Assistant Director Steven D\u2019Antuono told reporters, \u201cWe have no indication<\/span><\/em> of that, at this time<\/span><\/em>.\u201d<\/span><\/strong><\/span>…”<\/p>\n

One<\/em><\/span> of two<\/span><\/em> things is true<\/span><\/em>: (A) Ms. Bernstein didn’t recognize the significant distinction between the FBI…yes, THAT<\/span><\/em> FBI, the guys who perpetrated the greatest fraud ever played upon the American people<\/span><\/em>…absolving<\/span><\/em> Antifa of any involvement or having no information<\/span><\/em> regarding their participation at this<\/span><\/em> stage of their…”investigation”, or (B) she deliberately didn’t include<\/span><\/em> Mr. D’Antuono’s full statement in her headline.\u00a0 Either answer gives us grave cause for concern, particularly<\/em><\/span> when the source is NRO<\/em>.<\/strong><\/p>\n

After all, as this item from Gateway Pundit suggests<\/span><\/em><\/span><\/a>, it’s not like the “authorities” would lie to us<\/span><\/em>.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

One other quick point, if we may: most if not all of those comparing last Wednesday’s breaching of the all-too-penetrable defenses of the Capitol by a largely unarmed mob to the attack by some 44 artillery pieces and mortars on Fort Sumter describe the participants as “Trump supporters” or “defenders of the president” (Ms. Bernstein’s phraseology “pro-Trump supporters” being redundant, as an “anti-Trump supporter” or “pro-Trump adversary” would both be oxymorons).\u00a0 Which we can only assume includes us, though we only voted for The Donald in the general elections.\u00a0 We cast our ballot for Ted Cruz in the 2016 Republican primary, and didn’t bother to vote in the 2020 primary, as Trump was a lock for the Republican nomination.\u00a0 Fact is, we likely wouldn’t EVER have voted for him if the absolute a*sclowns heading both parties and the MSM hadn’t forced us to do so.<\/strong><\/p>\n

They say a drowning man will clutch at anything to stay afloat, and Trump’s the only life ring these despicable, duplicitous degenerates offered us.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Here’s the juice: Bush I begat Clinton and Bush II begat Obama; but it was a combination of Obama’s Socialism, the MSM’s sycophancy and the sophistry of the craven capitulator desirous of being Bush III (Jeb “Illegal immigration is often an act of love!” Bush) who begat The Donald.\u00a0 And i<\/strong>f Biden miraculously manages to hang around long enough for a shot at reelection, or, as is far more likely, Kamalaa is the 2024 Dimocratic candidate, if Trump’s running against them, we’ll vote for him a third time<\/span><\/em>.\u00a0 Which is why they fear him still<\/em><\/span>, and will possibly seek to impeach him even after he leaves office<\/span><\/em>.<\/strong><\/p>\n

P.S. We invite you to participate in our latest poll concerning the odds Joe Manchin will uphold his oath to support and defend the Constitution.\u00a0 With no intention whatsoever to influence your vote, we’re of the opinion Joe’s patriotic impulses will prove, unlike the Capitol’s defenses, impenetrable…right up until he’s given tens of millions under the table and can take home $10,000 and a lifetime supply of Oxycontin for every one of his West Virginia constituents.\u00a0 Along with employment as a…<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

…coder.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Now, here’s\u00a0The Gouge<\/em>!<\/strong><\/p>\n

First up, Biden, Kamalaa and their MSM shills…along with every other Libtard frequenting Facebook<\/em> and\/or Twitter<\/em>…are all indignant over the supposed disparity in treatment accorded the Black Lie Matters\u00a0<\/em>rioters\u00a0following George Floyd’s death-by-fentanyl and those who assaulted the Capitol last Wednesday:<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Not one report we read, including the CNN<\/em> article which provided the graphic above, bothered to record important figures needed to give those numbers any meaningful context<\/span><\/em>, including<\/span><\/em>, but not limited to<\/span><\/em>: (1) the total number of respective rioters; (<\/strong>2) the ethnicity of those arrested; and, (3) the nature of the charges filed against them.<\/strong><\/p>\n

More importantly, we recommend they voice their concerns<\/span><\/em> with D.C.’s mayor<\/span><\/em>…<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

…who is Black.\u00a0 Along with the District’s chief of police<\/span><\/em>…<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

…who is also<\/em><\/span> Black.\u00a0 Or the more than 60% of D.C. law enforcement officers<\/em><\/span> who are…<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

…you guessed it<\/em><\/span>…likewise\u00a0Black<\/span><\/em>!\u00a0 D*mned racists!<\/strong><\/p>\n

This comparison forwarded by Balls Cotton speaks volumes:<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Next, as\u00a0Townhall.com<\/em>‘s Matt Vespa relates, a Liberal reporter predicts…<\/strong><\/p>\n

The New Authoritarian Liberal-left Is Going to be Absolutely Ruthless<\/span><\/span><\/a><\/h1>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

As recounted by Tucker Carlson, CNN<\/em>‘s own coverage<\/span> clearly indicates<\/span><\/em> what threat level Conservatives should<\/span><\/em> be recording:<\/strong><\/p>\n