{"id":91910,"date":"2021-04-03T22:27:21","date_gmt":"2021-04-04T02:27:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thedailygouge.com\/?p=91910"},"modified":"2021-04-03T22:27:25","modified_gmt":"2021-04-04T02:27:25","slug":"the-daily-gouge-archive-friday-april-2nd-2021","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thedailygouge.com\/?p=91910","title":{"rendered":"The Daily Gouge Archive, Friday, April 2nd, 2021"},"content":{"rendered":"

It’s Friday, April 2nd, 2021…but before we begin,\u00a0NRO<\/em>\u00a0details\u00a0the ultimate insult to those paying teacher salaries, as,…<\/strong><\/p>\n

For San Diego Parents, Prioritizing Migrants for In-Person Instruction Is \u2018a Slap in the Face<\/span><\/span><\/a>\u2019<\/span><\/h1>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

“In the San Diego Unified School District (SDUSD),\u00a0teachers are being permitted to volunteer to teach migrant children in person this week,<\/a>\u00a0while their own public-school students \u2014 who remain at home, stuck in virtual learning \u2014 are on spring break.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

…<\/span>Meanwhile,\u00a0reports indicate that there have been 82 positive cases of COVID-19<\/a><\/span>\u00a0<\/em><\/span>detected among the 700 migrant children detained in the county, a far higher rate than the overall rate of COVID-19 cases in the county at large<\/span><\/em> \u2014 even as COVID remains the ostensible reason that San Diego public-school students continue to learn remotely.<\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

The SDUSD spokeswoman has not responded to questions about the COVID-19 rate at the facility or its consequences for San Diego\u2019s public-school teachers who will be teaching there in person<\/strong><\/span>…”<\/p>\n

Question: The hypocrisy and dereliction of duty aside, if the Wuhan virus was even remotely<\/span><\/em> as deadly as we’re instructed to believe, why on earth would this be permitted<\/span><\/em>, let alone encouraged<\/span><\/em>?\u00a0 Answer: It would not…because it isn’t.<\/strong><\/p>\n

In a related item, Townhall.com<\/em>‘s Reagan McCarthy reports…<\/strong><\/p>\n

Wisconsin Supreme Court Delivers a Blow to Gov. Tony Evers’ Pandemic Mandate<\/span><\/a><\/h1>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

“The Wisconsin Supreme Court delivered a blow to Democrat Governor Tony Evers (D-WI) by striking down his statewide mask mandate; the court concluded that Evers overstepped his executive authority by authorizing a renewal of the mandate unilaterally<\/span><\/em>.\u00a0<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Justice Brian Hagedorn wrote that the court believes that Evers did not act in compliance of the law by issuing mandates that exceed his authority as governor.<\/span> “The question in this case is not<\/span><\/em> whether the Governor acted wisely<\/em><\/span>; it is whether he acted lawfully<\/span><\/em>.<\/span> We<\/em><\/span> conclude he did not<\/span><\/em>.”<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

…Wednesday\u2019s ruling is not the first setback for Evers regarding COVID restrictions. In May, the court struck down the governor\u2019s \u201csafer at home\u201d edict, ruling that he did not have the power<\/span><\/em> to issue such an executive order<\/span><\/strong><\/span>…”<\/p>\n

Not to beat a dead horse, but as Tucker records in words coming from the very mouths of those owned lock, stock and barrel by Beijing…<\/strong><\/p>\n