It’s Wednesday, September 7th, 2016…but before we begin, The Wicked Witch of the West Wing is apparently immune to the effects H2O had on her fictional twin sister:
Many legitimately question Hillary’s health…though we can’t imagine those willing to overlook her penchant for prevarication regarding her suffering the final stages of syphilis or even Alzheimer’s as disqualifying her from the presidency.
Hope ‘n Change, however, offers an alternative explanation for Hillary’s coughing fits:
For those interested, The American Mirror offers a timeline of Hillary’s unexpected episodes of expectoration, while World Net Daily details what a number of medical professionals…not her “personal physician” nor the MSM…consider genuine concerns about this horrid harpy’s health.
We’re of the opinion anything the Clintons vociferously deny or attempt to sweep under Hillary’s voluminous pantsuits is likely cause for further investigation…though NOT by James Comey’s FBI!
Now, here’s The Gouge!
First up, the insight of Gary Saul Morson, a professor at Northwestern, into “the hidden horrors of Soviet life” from the September issue of the New Criterion as quoted in the WSJ:
‘Being leftwing means never having to say you’re sorry.’
Pol Pot’s murder of a quarter of Cambodia’s population has not dimmed academic enthusiasm for the Marxism his henchmen studied in Paris. Neither the Chinese Cultural Revolution nor the Great Purges seem to have cast a shadow on the leftists who apologized for them. Quite the contrary, university classes typically blame the Cold War on American “paranoia” about communism and still picture Bolsheviks as idealists in too great a hurry. Being leftwing means never having to say you’re sorry…
Our knowledge of Bolshevik horrors expanded dramatically when, after the fall of the Soviet Union, its archives were opened. Jonathan Brent and Yale University Press brought out volume after volume of chilling documents, but public opinion did not noticeably change. How many readers of The New York Times know about its role in covering up the worst of Stalin’s crimes and earning a Pulitzer Prize (still unreturned) for doing so?
I understand being so carried away by Communist ideals that one denies or justifies millions of deaths.(WE sure as hell do not!) What amazes me is that people and publications who have done so still feel entitled to criticize others from a position of moral superiority…
I first grasped what Stalinist life was like during a course I took with Wolfgang Leonhard, the child of German communists who was brought up in the USSR, defected to Yugoslavia, and wound up teaching Russian history at Yale. His autobiography, Child of the Revolution, tells a story, set during the Great Purges, about some families in a communal apartment who are awakened at 4 a.m. (the usual time for arrests) by a peremptory banging at the door. Finally one old man, with less life left to lose, answers, disappears into the corridor, and at last returns. “Comrades, relax!” he explains. “The house is on fire!”
If one accurately assesses the death toll inflicted upon humanity by The Left in all its guises, the total is truly staggering; indeed, it’s beyond human comprehension:
Try WELL over 220,000,000 and…
Then again, as John Hawkins relates at Townhall.com, what can one expect from a segment of society whose primary characteristic is self-absorbed hypocrisy…of the rankest variety?!?
“Liberals are the sort of people who eat cheeseburgers while they send vulgar messages to hunters who post pics of their kills. They’re the sort of people who ride in a private jet to an overseas conference where they claim our extravagant Western lifestyle is destroying the planet.They’re the sort of people who oppose drilling any new oil wells and then complain because gas prices are so high.
Liberals love America.Except for our past. And our capitalistic economic system.And our flag. And most of the people who don’t want liberals micromanaging their lives. But, don’t you call them unpatriotic because they support higher taxes…which makes them more patriotic than people who actually love their country. Or Something.
Liberals laugh at Christians who are serious about their faith, mock morality at every turn and do everything they can to promote degeneracy. Then they’re outraged if anyone notes the obvious fact that they’re morally inferior to conservatives.
Liberals are the sort of people who obsessively call other people racist right after they imply black Americans are too stupid, poor and lazy to get voter ID like everyone else in America.
Liberals are the sort of people who do everything they can to facilitate the deaths of millions of female babies via abortion and demand that men be allowed to use the women’s restroom even as they claim conservatives are engaged in a war on women.They’re the sort of people who sneer, “How could anyone vote for Donald Trump?” even as they put up a yard sign for a woman who would be the most corrupt, dishonest and incompetent President in American history.
You want to know how to make a liberal Democrat mad? Tell him the truth. Not the sugar coated, “We don’t want to trigger anyone,” happy talk that liberals are used to, but the real truth.
Hillary Clinton wouldn’t be a Top 1000 contender for the presidency if she weren’t a woman and riding on her more popular husband’s shoulders. Speaking of Hillary, she deserves to be in jail, not the White House. In fact, if she’s elected, she’ll be the first President who has done enough to merit impeachment before she even enters the Oval Office. This is a woman who has essentially said, “I don’t understand how classified information works, derp” and liberals want to make her president.
Liberals are the sort of people who think guns are bad and a fence on the border won’t work while they stand at the White House and wait for armed Secret Service agents to allow them in for a tour. Liberals are the sort of people who’ll demand that the government “stay out of our bedrooms” while they try to force nuns to provide abortions and birth control. Liberals are the sort of people who’ll tell you conservatives are “angry” right after they obsessively hurl hate and abuse at the police, the military and Christians…”
Liberals: from the great to the small, the short to the tall, irrespective of color, creed, gender, religion or period in history, they’re all about as useful as a…
“The Obama administration followed up a planeload of $400 million in cash sent to Iran in January with two more such shipments in the next 19 days, totaling another $1.3 billion, according to congressional officials briefed by the U.S. State, Treasury and Justice departments.
The cash payments—made in Swiss francs, euros and other currencies—settled a decades-old dispute over a failed arms deal dating back to 1979. U.S. officials have acknowledged the payment of the first $400 million coincided with Iran’s release of American prisoners and was used as leverage to ensure they were flown out of Tehran’s Mehrabad on the morning of Jan. 17…”
Since we’re on the subject of the most destructive force in history, courtesy of Tom Bakke and ExtraNewsfeed.com, Amy Sterling Casil assists us in…
“…I am not only qualified to assess the Clinton Foundation, I am also in a position that enables me to do so without fear of harming people in need. Any nonprofit professional in the U.S. can look at the Foundation’s own statements, tax filings and financial reports and see there is something wrong.No one who works for a nonprofit right now should do so because of the Clinton penchant for revenge and clear signs there are problems in tax and law enforcement that could lead to harm of their organization or clients. Ethically, they ought not comment because they will put their organizations or those they are charged to serve at-risk.
Since I don’t work in the nonprofit field any longer and know I will never be able to return to it, I am free to write these articles. There are only two things I can identify at which the Clinton Foundation excels: putting cash in the bank and spending it.
“New revelations from a Friday FBI document dump show a Clinton Foundation laptop containing Hillary Clinton’s personal email server archive was “lost” in the mail after a staffer sent it to the former Secretary of State and current Democrat presidential nominee. The laptop was requested to be turned over by the FBI as part of the criminal investigation into Clinton’s use of multiple private email servers to store and transmit top secret, classified information. From Bloomberg:
A personal laptop computer used to archive Hillary Clinton’s e-mails when she was secretary of state went missing after being put in the mail, according to the FBI’s report on its investigation into her use of a private e-mail system.E-mails that Clinton sent and received through her private server during her tenure were archived on the laptop in 2013 by a person who was an assistant to former President Bill Clinton, the FBI said in its heavily redacted investigative report released Friday.
Someone whose name was redacted in the FBI report told the agency that he later deleted the e-mails from the laptop but didn’t wipe its hard drive. A computer technician can often recover such e-mails that have been deleted but not permanently erased from a laptop’s memory.
The FBI sought the laptop as part of its investigation, but it’s whereabouts remain unknown, the bureau said: The last time the laptop was seen was when it was put in the mail…”
Yeah,…and the dog…
…ate 30,000 of Hillary’s electronic mail transmissions!!!
The more one learns about the reality of “Mrs” Clinton’s unsecured, private email server, the more one is forced to conclude James Comey is as crooked as she is!
Then WHY did you concoct the video story in the first place?!?
“Newly released emails suggest a senior Hillary Clinton aide stage-managed her first hearing on the Benghazi terrorist attack by feeding specific topics Clinton wanted to address to Democratic Sen. Robert Menendez, who at the time was acting chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee.
“We wired it that Menendez would provide an opportunity to address two topics we needed to debunk (her actions/whereabouts on 9/11, and these email from Chris Stevens about moving locations,)” Clinton media gatekeeper Philippe Reines wrote to Chelsea Clinton the morning of the Jan. 23, 2013 hearing.
Right out of the gate, the first hearing question from Menendez that day covered both topics referenced by Reines…”
Are we the only one left wondering why Reines was communicating this fact to Chelsea…not to mention why Hillary was emailing her daughter the night she left four Americans to die in Benghazi?!?
Moving on, as recorded at TruthRevolt.org, at least according to…
Charles Barkley: ‘Brainwashed’ Blacks, Not Whites, Are Keeping Blacks Down
In light of 49er quarterback Colin Kaepernick’s outrageous accusation that the United States is a country that oppresses people of color, it’s worth noting that NBA legend Charles Barkley gave an interview recently to a local Philadelphia radio station in which he stated that “unintelligent,” “brainwashed” African-Americans, not whites or cops, are the ones keeping successful blacks down.
“Unfortunately, as I tell my white friends, we as black people, we’re never going to be successful, not because of you white people, but because of other black people.When you’re black, you have to deal with so much crap in your life from other black people. It’s a dirty, dark secret; I’m glad it’s coming out.”
“One of the reasons we’re never going to be successful as a whole, because of other black people. And for some reason we are brainwashed to think, if you’re not a thug or an idiot, you’re not black enough. If you go to school, make good grades, speak intelligent, and don’t break the law, you’re not a good black person. And it’s a dirty, dark secret.”
“There are a lot of black people who are unintelligent, who don’t have success. It’s best to knock a successful black person down because they’re intelligent, they speak well, they do well in school, and they’re successful…We’re the only ethnic group who say, ‘Hey, if you go to jail, it gives you street cred.’ It’s just typical BS that goes on when you’re black, man.”
For those dismissive of Barkley’s opinions…
…was Booker T. Washington also underserving of credibility?