It’s Friday, December 7th, 2018…but before we begin, courtesy of Kate Hite, here’s the only thing we ever found funny about a funeral:

Now, we interrupt our regularly scheduled programming for this late-breaking headline:

Feds Discover Largest Oil, Natural-Gas Reserve in History

 

The federal government has discovered a massive new reserve of oil and natural gas in Texas and New Mexico that it says has the “largest continuous oil and gas resource potential ever assessed.”

“Christmas came a few weeks early this year,” Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke said of the new reserve, which is believed to have enough energy to fuel the U.S. for nearly seven years. In all, the new reserve is said to contain 281 trillion cubic feet of natural gas, 46.3 billion barrels of oil, and 20 billion barrels of natural-gas liquids, the Interior Department’s U.S. Geological Survey said…”

To set the record straight, the only oil The Obamao ever provided the citizens of the Unites States was…


Now, here’s The Gouge!

First up, Mazie Hirono, who was last heard from as the woman who, during the Kavanaugh Kangaroo Court, cooly analyzed the situation and determined the solution was for men to shut up, suggests…

Dems have hard time connecting to voters because they know so much: Hirono

 

“…Hirono, 71, said Democrats need to stop speaking in a way that comes off as manipulative or strokes fear and resentment.

But we have a really hard time doing that and one of the reasons– it was told to me at one of our retreats– was that we Democrats know so much, that is true. And we have kind of have to tell everyone how smart we are and so we have a tendency to be very left brain,” she continued.

The left-hand side of the brain is often associated with analytical thought...”

Hirono’s inflated sense of self brings to mind thoughts expressed by two individuals we respected and loved: Ronald Reagan…

…and our dear departed Mother, who always impressed upon us the importance of humility with this adage: “Let another’s lips praise thee, not thine own“!

Here’s the juice: both history and current events…along with the leading luminaries of her own political party…

…seriously undercut Hirono’s claim to some superior Progressive intellectual prowess.  Besides, intellect bereft of common sense is worthless, carrying the same status and significance as that enjoyed by the smartest kid in the Remedial Ed class.

Next up, in a forward from Jeff Foutch, the Washington Examiner exposes another Liberal lie which the MSM has enshrined as fact:

Census confirms: 63 percent of ‘non-citizens’ on welfare, 4.6 million households

 

A majority of “non-citizens,” including those with legal green card rights, are tapping into welfare programs set up to help poor and ailing Americans, a Census Bureau finding that bolsters President Trump’s concern about immigrants costing the nation.

In a new analysis of the latest numbers, from 2014, 63 percent of non-citizens are using a welfare program, and it grows to 70 percent for those here 10 years or more, confirming another concern that once immigrants tap into welfare, they don’t get off it

The Center for Immigration Studies said in its report that the numbers give support for Trump’s plan to cut non-citizens off welfare from the “public charge” if they want a green card that allows them to legally work in the United States.

…“Concern over immigrant welfare use is justified, as households headed by non-citizens use means-tested welfare at high rates. Non-citizens in the data include illegal immigrants, long-term temporary visitors like guest workers, and permanent residents who have not naturalized. While barriers to welfare use exist for these groups, it has not prevented them from making extensive use of the welfare system, often receiving benefits on behalf of U.S.-born children,” added the Washington-based immigration think tank.

The numbers are huge. The report said that there are 4,684,784 million non-citizen households receiving welfare. And nearly all, 4,370,385, have at least one worker in the house…”

Make that 4,684,784…plus one:

Honduran woman, 19, in migrant caravan scales border wall to give birth in US after 2,000-mile trip

 

Calling the birth in the U.S. a “big reward” for her family’s journey, Serrano-Hernandez told Univision, which documented parts of their journey: “With the faith in God, I always said my son will be born there (in America).”

After somehow climbing the border wall, (Gee, wonder whether Univision might have helped!) Serrano-Hernandez and her family were met by three border patrol agents who demanded they return to Tijuana. The family refused and asked for asylum. They were taken to the Imperial Beach Station in San Diego County for processing.

…U.S. Customs and Border Patrol agency told Fox News: “The woman, who was eight months pregnant, began complaining of abdominal pain (Nov. 27) and was immediately transported to a local hospital by Border Patrol agents.”

But it wasn’t all roses and rainbows after that. I felt like a criminal,” Serrano-Hernandez said…”

¡Ay, pobrecita!  Possibly because, under the laws of the Estados Unidos…THAT’S PRECISELY WHAT YOU ARE!!!

Since we’re calling a spade a spade, writing at the WSJ, Kim Strassel correctly identifies Robert…

Mueller’s Gift to Obama

Shouldn’t the special counsel investigate the crimes that drew Flynn into his probe?

 

“Robert Mueller looks to be approaching his endgame, and the press is alive with speculation as to how bad the special counsel’s report will be for President Trump. It’s also worth noticing how good Mr. Mueller has been to another president, Barack Obama, and his team.

This benevolence was on display in the sentencing document the special counsel’s office filed on Tuesday for Mike Flynn. The former Trump national security adviser, we are told, has provided “substantial assistance,” sitting for 19 interviews that aided in “several ongoing investigations.” In light of this help, the Mueller team recommends leniency—perhaps even sparing him prison time.

But what about the potential crimes that put Mr. Flynn in Mr. Mueller’s crosshairs to begin with? On Jan. 2, 2017, the Obama White House learned about Mr. Flynn’s conversations with Mr. Kislyak. The U.S. monitors phone calls of foreign officials, but under law they are supposed to “minimize” the names of any Americans caught up in such eavesdropping. In the Flynn case, someone in the prior administration either failed to minimize or purposely “unmasked” Mr. Flynn. The latter could itself be a felony.

Ten days later someone in that administration leaked to the Washington Post that Mr. Flynn had called Mr. Kislyak on Dec. 29, 2016. On Feb. 9, 2017, someone leaked to the Post and the New York Times highly detailed and classified information about the Flynn-Kislyak conversation.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes has called this leak the most destructive to national security that he seen in his time in Washington. Disclosing classified information is a felony punishable by up to 10 years in federal prison. The Post has bragged that its story was sourced by nine separate officials.

The Mueller team has justified its legal wanderings into money laundering (Paul Manafort) and campaign contributions (Michael Cohen) on grounds that it has an obligation to follow up on any evidence of crimes, no matter how disconnected from its Russia mandate. Mr. Flynn’s being caught up in the probe is related to a glaring potential crime of disclosing classified material, yet Mr. Mueller appears to have undertaken no investigation of that. Is this selective justice, or something worse? Don’t forget Mr. Mueller stacked his team with Democrats, some of whom worked at the highest levels of the Obama administration, including at the time of the possible Flynn unmasking and the first leak.

No conflict of interest here!

The Mueller team in its document praises Mr. Flynn’s “exemplary” military and public service, but concluded that “senior government leaders” should nonetheless “be held to the highest standards.” If only Mr. Mueller believed that applied to all public officials, including Obama Democrats.

But he doesn’t, which is why this entire affair isn’t an investigation, but a bi-partisan farce solely intended to take down Trump; not through impeachment or any other lawful means, but through rumor, misrepresentation and innuendo.

If you’ve never seen A Bridge Too Far, it’s Richard Attenborough’s (yes, John Hammond in Jurassic Park) very accurate adaptation (well-worth viewing) of Cornelius Ryan’s account of Britain’s Field Marshal Bernard Law Montgomery’s poorly-conceived and even more poorly-executed attempt to “end the war by Christmas”.  In a nutshell, what could go wrong with an armored thrust 60 miles up a single, narrow two-lane road hoping to tie up with the largest airborne operation in history intended to cross the Rhine by taking and holding numerous bridges with light infantry weapons against armored opposition until relieved?!?

In one of our favorites scenes, involving some of our favorite actors (including Jeremy Kemp, notable if nor nothing else than his role in The Blue Max, which would have been so much better without George Peppard, who was possessed of a Kevin-Costner like inability to feign a foreign accent!), Polish General Sosabowski, portrayed by Gene Hackman, questions the loyalty of an RAF officer, played by Kemp, who’s more concerned with saving airframes than the lives of paratroopers and success of the mission:

Here’s our point: we’d pose the same question to Jeff Flake and any other Republican who’s ever offered even a scintilla of support for an investigation which is as every bit as much a Kangaroo Court as the Kavanaugh hearings.

Speaking of shams, as we learn in the latest installment of the Environmental Moment, courtesy today of FOX News via George Lawlor…

Climate watchdog Bernie Sanders spent nearly $300G on private air travel in October

 

Bernie Sanders is so concerned about climate change that he spent nearly $300,000 on private air travel in October so he could speak to audiences in nine battleground states prior to November’s midterm elections.

Sanders’ 2018 campaign committee issued an Oct. 10 payment of $297,685 to New York-based Apollo Jets, a charter jet company used by retired sports stars Derek Jeter and Shaquille O’Neal, according to federal campaign reports obtained by VTDigger.org, a watchdog news site in Vermont.

The Sanders campaign purchased nearly $5,000 in carbon offsets to balance out the emissions produced from the travel. A carbon offset is a reduction in emissions to compensate for emissions elsewhere…”

Actually, for those not familiar with the terminology of the anthropogenic global warming scam, the theory is, when you buy an offset, you fund projects which (theoretically) reduce greenhouse gasses; such as projects which might restore rainforests, might update power plants and factories or might increase the energy efficiency of buildings and transportation.

See, carbon offsets let you pay to reduce potential greenhouse emissions through the potential efforts of others while not making radical or inconvenient reductions on your own.

As Hamlet noted, here’s the rub: carbon offsets are voluntary.  Thus, it’s difficult to judge the quality of either offset providers or projects. Trees don’t always live a full life, sequestration projects (see “Solyndra“) sometimes fail and offset companies occasionally deceive their customers. (After all, aren’t ALL corporations evil by definition?!?)

In reality, far from making any meaningful contribution to the reduction of greenhouse gasses, carbon offsets are just a means by which Limousine Liberals can own multiple mansions, drive gas-guzzling SUVs and travel via private jets, yet still convince themselves they’re committed to saving the planet and sleep well at night.

In other words, carbon offsets raise awareness of greenhouse gasses with the unwashed masses without impacting the ability of the rich and famous to enjoy the lifestyle thereof.

Though if the recent riots in France are any indication…

…the unwashed masses ain’t buyin’ it! 

On The Lighter Side:

And just when you thought Progressives couldn’t get any crazier, PETA pushes the limit, as this forward by Bill Meisen confirms:

PETA calls for end of ‘anti-animal language,’ provides alternative phrases to old sayings

 

Old sayings may seem harmless, but, according to PETA, they could actually be viewed as anti-animal language and normalize animal cruelty. The animal-rights group is pushing for “animal-friendly idioms” and provided a list of suggestions people can use to avoid offending vegans, PETA said

“Words matter, and as our understanding of social justice evolves, our language evolves along with it,” PETA said in its tweet. “Just as it became unacceptable to use racist, homophobic, or ableist language, phrases that trivialize cruelty to animals will vanish as more people begin to appreciate animals for who they are…”

Guess this means TLJ will no longer be singing…

Not to mention we’ve bought our last bottle of Enjoli!

Finally, though we forgive…

…we’ll never forget:

Magoo



Archives